traditional project management methodologies work best if the projects do not have a lot of doubts and there are many variables move to take care of at one time . At present, the enterprise gets more and more complex and increased complications compared with those of the old days where a simple methodologies and tools of the project can not be that something is not possible, no more projects today.
The following are some key differences between traditional versus contemporary project management.
1. The traditional management projects are suitable for projects with low budget, containing 2-3 variables only, with a medium period of time not to exceed six months from conception to post. While contemporary project management is not feasible for someone without experience or skills to manage because of its complexity. This is the reason why I was called out as a PMP certification is a prerequisite for the project manager today.
2. Replace the predictive planning with planning to adapt. In the traditional world, everything is much simpler, and therefore predictable. There is a project management tool is simple to do the work for planning predictive projects. We are moving now into a new arena where growing, which called for project management skills in terms of "essential" in the organization due to the increased complexity of the current projects and multiple problems around it, with a lot of restrictions to take care of
3. contemporary project in response to changes to work with the director to adapt and not the corrective actions that have been commonly used in traditional project approach. The basic problem with many of the traditional project management frameworks and perhaps more important for science than it is for business. In today's world, the project manager needs to be flexible enough to deal with and manage many changes at one time. To enable this, the only way is to adapt to the surrounding environment and many different constraints faced by the project. The basic problem with many of the traditional project management frameworks and perhaps more important for science than it is to work
4. No doubt, good planning is essential for the start of the project was successful, but the perfect plan is really a myth. There is no such thing as a perfect plan and perfect project. In theory, he wrote to manage projects provide guidelines for the work of a good plan can be work out of. However, from the viewpoint of the modern project manager, it is the ability to stand up and adapt to these changes that make the difference.
5. contemporary project management, stressing the implementation, not the side of planning for the project. This does not mean that planning is not important, but it must be a pressure main and the main focus on the side of the project as soon as the project has gone out to imagine the planning stages. All action items until the need for very close follow-up and monitoring. This is to ensure there are no missing items on science, not on the look of open or pending action items and the lack of hidden gaps unexplored issues ... etc.
6. traditional project manager does not focus on cooperation between the working group for the project. They are learning to Top- down approach in mind, and is not intended for cooperation open. And management tools make traditional project director of the basic element of communication project, including the need to remind the members of the team on dead lines and late tasks. Contemporary project managers see this as a waste of resources as it is not the responsibility PM to keep reminding the dead lines, but to ensure itself the entire close cooperation in place within the team. If everyone is committed to the project in full, and to recall the dead lines or on late tasks it is actually not necessary at all.
0 Komentar